Welcome to WEAP's Website WEAP
WEAP is an initiative of the Stockholm Environment Institute.

About WEAP

What's New?
Sample Screens
History and Credits

Using WEAP
User Guide
Videos (YouTube)

User Forum
Members List
Edit Profile

Additional Support
University Courses

About Us
SEI-US Water Resources Program
Please Contact Us

Interested in Energy?
Read about LEAP: SEI's software for energy planning.

Link WEAP and LEAP for combined Water-Energy planning.
Watch a video demo!

User Forum

All Topics | Topic "Interesting Reservoir Operations Problem"
Log in to post new messages or reply to existing messages.
Author Message
Mr. James Syme

Subject: Interesting Reservoir Operations Problem   
Posted: 12/8/2016 Viewed: 12055 times
Hello WEAP Community,

This is my first time posting here, though I've been using WEAP for a few years now. I've run in to an interesting issue with reservoir operations changing completely based on the inclusion of a demand node or not.

We've modeled a relatively intricate system of reservoirs and transfers that eventually converge at three primary points to convey water to demands downstream, with one primary river carrying the bulk. There are several associated demand nodes pulling from this river (6 in the system total). At this time, the reservoirs deplete completely differently based on whether or not I add a 7th "dummy" demand node *that is not connected to the system in any way*. The node I add has 0 demand and no links to the surrounding system. When I add this node, the reservoirs deplete and behave more as expected. Without it, however, the reservoirs do not empty as expected, and many of the canals go underutilized.

Has anyone else experienced a problem like this before, and if so, is there anything else I might be missing? It seems to me like a bug, but I want to be sure I'm thorough about this...


Topic "Interesting Reservoir Operations Problem"